Thursday, April 17, 2008

Game 5 Preview - I've discovered a use for enforcers

The Calgary Flames got 10 shots on net in game 4. Ten. That's 5 less than the previous franchise low for a play-off game. Of course, they also managed to put 13 pucks wide and have another 15 blocked. That means Nabby was forced to make a play on less than one third (10/38) of the total shots the Flames directed at the net. In contrast, the Sharks got 32 of a possible 57 shots on Kipper (56%), thus the giant discrepancy.

Perhaps what's most galling is the shot count isn't indicative of the play. San Jose certainly took over at the end of the third, but the Flames had a fair share of opportunities themselves - The Conroy 2on1, the Iggy-Juice-Langkow 3on1, 4 different PPs. Here's the problem, though: the Flames generated just a single shot from those 3 scenarios. One! Normally you're doing something wrong if you only get a lone GOAL from a couple of odd-man breaks and 4 PP chances...to say nothing of managing just a shot on net. Ugh!

Anyways, it should go without saying that the Flames can't pull the same shit tonight. Look fellas - shoot it at Nabokov's chest if you have to. At least make him make a save, even if it's an easy one.

Tell you what, let's set-up a simple punishment system: If a forward like Conroy, for instance, shoots it wide (and out of zone) on a 2on1 again (or in the slot, at the top of the circle, etc.), I say let Godard get two free shots at his exposed scrotum during the intermission. That should act as ample deterrent for Connie and crew and at least make Eric* somewhat useful for a change.

*(this rule should NOT apply to Godard himself as it tends to be difficult to convince a man to punch himself in the sack. Also, the fact that Godard is in the offensive end and taking any sort of shot at all should be celebrated and rewarded).

Prediction - The Godard deterrent works. Flames take some shots - and score. Calgary 3, Sharks 2. Iginla, Huselius and Nolan for Calgary. The irrepressible Ryan Clowe (X2) for San Jose.

PS - Vic Ferrari offers some actual analysis, confirming my annoyance re: Keenan getting away from the Conroy/Tanguay/Iginla vs. Thornton match-up that seemed to work so well in game 3.

19 comments:

walkinvisible said...

HUZZAH !!! finally a use discovered for #17 !!!!

Temujin said...

9-0 Sharks

Thorton with 6, Marleau with 2, and Nabokov with one.

And Temujin gloats wildly at around 1030pm, pdt.

MetroGnome said...

Hey, how are the Canucks doing by the way?

ben said...

All I know is that if I have to hear the word "Thornton" one more time when he's not actively involved in a play, I'm going to have to punch a baby.

Thornton.

Nathan Muhly said...

Perhaps what's most galling is the shot count isn't indicative of the play.

I agree, it felt like the Flames were at least keeping up with Sharks in terms of actual chances and there didn't seem to be much of an advantage either way in offensive pressure, excepting the first and last 10 minutes of the game. A large portion of SJ's shots came from outside in the first 3/4 of the game and Calgary were able to keep them to the outside. If they can do the same tonight and manage to generate more chances simply by shooting more they should give the Sharks a run for their money. Here's hoping they can sustain that 20% shooting percentage ;)

Ricci's ugly!

ngthagg said...

From the offical Flames website: tonight's game is CRITICAL. Not just big, critical. That's official, folks.

As nice as the missed/blocked shots are, we do need to get pucks on Nabokov. I really think he's the weakest part of the Sharks. I don't know exactly what his problem is, but his save % just isn't that great. .886? Including a shutout? That's exploitable.

MetroGnome said...

we do need to get pucks on Nabokov.

I emphatically agree. Thus the proposed Godard/sack punch consequence for missing shots.

ngthagg said...

I wasn't sure if the shots Godard would be taking would be with his fist or with a puck. I guess I didn't need to wonder, since 98% of his shots with a puck would be discovered, under review, to have actually only hit the thigh.

Mike said...

Nice, after the first we already put more shots on net than last game.

therealdeal said...

I honestly don't think Craig Conroy is a useful hockey player anymore.

MetroGnome said...

Conroy has been awful tonight.

walkinvisible said...

conroy has been awful for some time now... so has eriksson, primeau, huselius, godard, aucoin etc. etc. . . . this is simply not a cup winning team.

crosby

Alex said...

I am glad I didn't waste studying time to watch this.

MetroGnome said...

It was actually a pretty entertaining game.

walkinvisible said...

fuck entertaining....
i'd take a boring game and a W than an awesome game and an L.

meh.

crosby

walkinvisible said...

btw: first goal = death.

MetroGnome said...

I toldja

OwenNolan27 said...

good effort but series over anyway

turning point in game 4

kipper don't freeze the puck with 12 seconds to go

ben said...

Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

Post a Comment