tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post8973656567775561882..comments2009-11-20T10:02:35.352-07:00Cucumbersliceshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11525653363146168135noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-51847004203308432982009-11-20T10:02:35.352-07:002009-11-20T10:02:35.352-07:00Wow. That&#39;s really weird. Though I&#39;m glad you didn&#39;t try counting chances using the radio. Now that could be an interesting experiment!Scott Reynoldshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05735545121522530577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-67591273472350945492009-11-20T08:16:21.506-07:002009-11-20T08:16:21.506-07:00Scott,<br /><br />That game wasn&#39;t televised anywhere, so unwatchable. I wasn&#39;t going to bother trying to count chances via the radio.Kent W.http://www.blogger.com/profile/15679878875910837307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-64465259205934780732009-11-20T01:22:51.496-07:002009-11-20T01:22:51.496-07:00Hey Kent,<br /><br />I have the Flames scoring chances after 20 stuff ready to go unless you&#39;re planning on putting something up for the Nov. 5 game against the Blues. Is that one at M+G somewhere, on a notepad waiting to be entered or just skipped over? Thanks again for putting a bunch of work into counting chances this year.Scott Reynoldshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05735545121522530577noreply@blogger.com