tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post8975792427105835385..comments2008-01-15T22:35:20.619-07:00Cucumbersliceshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11525653363146168135noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-50174026375394180862008-01-15T22:35:00.000-07:002008-01-15T22:35:00.000-07:00<I>the score kindof insinuates that they did</I><BR/><BR/>The score flatters them.<BR/><BR/>Seriously.MetroGnomehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15679878875910837307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-40719083426145736272008-01-15T21:57:00.000-07:002008-01-15T21:57:00.000-07:00<I>The Flames may as well have discarded their sticks, grabbed their ankles and skated around like that all night. </I><BR/><BR/>i couldn't [bring myself to] watch the game tonight, but by this note i am to understand that they did NOT grab their ankles and skate around like that all night ? <BR/>hmph.<BR/>the score kindof insinuates that they <I>did</I><BR/><BR/>CUJO ! CUJO ! CUJO ! <BR/>;)walkinvisiblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-73049405190499350062008-01-15T21:18:00.000-07:002008-01-15T21:18:00.000-07:00The Flames may as well have discarded their sticks, grabbed their ankles and skated around like that all night. <BR/><BR/>Embarrassing.MetroGnomehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15679878875910837307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-53899960117399313822008-01-15T21:15:00.000-07:002008-01-15T21:15:00.000-07:00Man, it's stankfest 08 ! what was that?Shannonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11432386486737112252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-79776667726334517302008-01-15T16:30:00.000-07:002008-01-15T16:30:00.000-07:00I don't like Ferraro. No one that lispy should talk about the Flames.ChunkyMoosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08930388226176817559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-9098786812462353502008-01-15T16:02:00.000-07:002008-01-15T16:02:00.000-07:00Ha, you said muffed !<BR/><BR/>;)<BR/><BR/>we're gonna lose.walkinvisiblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08874510508773958406noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-5326738719321830342008-01-15T14:36:00.000-07:002008-01-15T14:36:00.000-07:00<I>Eriksson can't possibly be as bad as he was against the Oil, can he? Can he? Cripes, that was atrocious.</I><BR/><BR/>No kidding. <BR/><BR/>I think there was an eloquent example of how and why Phaneuf's stats have suffered from playing with Eriksson most of the year: <BR/><BR/>I believe it was in the third where Eriksson muffed a play and then proceeded off the ice (or at least...nowhere near the play) - to leave Kipper and Dion to face the ensuing onslaught alone. If not for Phaneuf's two improbable goal mouth saves, the Oilers go up by two and salt the game away there. Ugh. <BR/><BR/>Im not totally certain about all that, but that's how it plays out in my memory.MetroGnomehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15679878875910837307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-2684303704485472322008-01-15T14:15:00.000-07:002008-01-15T14:15:00.000-07:00Eriksson can't possibly be as bad as he was against the Oil, can he? <I>Can he?</I> Cripes, that was atrocious.<BR/><BR/>Though Cruickshank is reporting that Aucoin may be back in the lineup tonight, so at least that gets #8 off of 1st-unit PP duty (and Sarich off of the 2nd-unit).Matthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13894292220067087783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16918358.post-45346764807931384992008-01-15T14:13:00.000-07:002008-01-15T14:13:00.000-07:00Ha, you said flaccid! At any rate, I think you're (as usual) 100% correct in your assumptions. Keenan is not a man of change in his habits. Even though a statistical moron like myself can see the 'kid' line getting clobbered.<BR/><BR/>At any rate. The boys need a win. I have a good feeling about it.Robhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03330486496972614962noreply@blogger.com